Comparison of check-all-that-apply and forced-choice Yes/No question formats for sensory characterisation

Dublin Core

Title

Comparison of check-all-that-apply and forced-choice Yes/No question formats for sensory characterisation

Subject

COMPORTAMIENTO DEL CONSUMIDOR
METODOLOGIA DE LA INVESTIGACION
BIBLIOGRAFIA NACIONAL QUIMICA
2014

Abstract

The application of check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions for sensory product characterisation is gaining acceptance and popularity. This question format has been reported to be a quick and reliable means of gathering sensory profiles from consumers, concurrently with hedonic assessment. However, a limitation of CATA questions is that they do not encourage deep processing by respondents. Forced-choice questions, where respondents answer “yes” or “no” for each term, may encourage systematic processing and be useful when consumers undertake sensory profiling tasks. This research compared sensory profiles elicited by consumers using CATA questions or forced-choice Yes/No questions and contribute to ongoing investigations of CATA questions and related question formats with a view to developing guidelines for best practise. Across seven consumer studies with 600+ consumers and multiple product categories, consistent evidence was obtained that forced-choice Yes/No questions are associated with higher term citation frequencies. However, this did not consistently translate into greater product discrimination. Conclusions regarding similarities and differences amongst samples and the stability of sample and term configurations were generally independent of question format (i.e., whether the sensory data were elicited by CATA or forced-choice Yes/No questions). Overall, the comparison of CATA and forced-choice Yes/No questions for sensory characterisation suggested parity of the two question formats. This extended to consumers’ perceived difficulty and tediousness for completing the test. Regardless of question format, consumers, on average, perceived the tests as easy and not tedious.

Creator

Jaeger, Sara R
Cadena, Rafael S.
Torres Moreno, Miriam
Antúnez, Lucía
Vidal, Leticia
Hunter, Denise C.
Beresford, Michelle K.
Kam, Karrie
Yin, David
Pailey, Amy G.
Chheang, Sok L.

Source

Food Quality and Preference v. 35, 2014. -- p. 32-40

Publisher

Elsevier

Date

2014

Rights

Información sobre Derechos de Autor

(Por favor lea este aviso antes de abrir los documentos u objetos)

La legislación uruguaya protege el derecho de autor sobre toda creación literaria, científica o artística, tanto en lo que tiene que ver con sus derechos morales, como en lo referente a los derechos patrimoniales con sujeción a lo establecido por el derecho común y las siguientes leyes

(LEY 9.739 DE 17 DE DICIEMBRE DE 1937 SOBRE PROPIEDAD LITERARIA Y ARTISTICA CON LAS MODIFICACIONES INTRODUCIDAS POR LA LEY DE DERECHO DE AUTOR Y DERECHOS CONEXOS No. 17.616 DE 10 DE ENERO DE 2003, LEY 17.805 DE 26 DE AGOSTO DE 2004, LEY 18.046 DE 24 DE OCTUBRE DE 2006 LEY 18.046 DE 24 DE OCTUBRE DE 2006)

ADVERTENCIA - La consulta de este documento queda condicionada a la aceptación de las siguientes condiciones de uso: Este documento es únicamente para usos privados enmarcados en actividades de investigación y docencia. No se autoriza su reproducción con fines de lucro. Esta reserva de derechos afecta tanto los datos del documento como a sus contenidos. En la utilización o cita de partes debe indicarse el nombre de la persona autora.

Format

PDF

Language

Inglés

Type

Artículo

Identifier

doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.02.004

Document Item Type Metadata

Original Format

PDF
Date Added
December 13, 2014
Collection
Bibliografía Nacional Química
Item Type
Document
Tags
,
Citation
Jaeger, Sara R et al., “Comparison of check-all-that-apply and forced-choice Yes/No question formats for sensory characterisation,” RIQUIM - Repositorio Institucional de la Facultad de Química - UdelaR, accessed November 17, 2025, https://riquim.fq.edu.uy/items/show/2294.