Comparison of consumer-based methodologies for sensory characterization : Case study with four sample sets of powdered drinks

Dublin Core

Title

Comparison of consumer-based methodologies for sensory characterization : Case study with four sample sets of powdered drinks

Subject

EVALUACION SENSORIAL
MAPEO PROYECTIVO
BEBIDAS EN POLVO
PERFIL DEL CONSUMIDOR
BIBLIOGRAFIA NACIONAL QUIMICA
2017

Abstract

Interest in consumer-based methodologies for sensory characterization has largely increased in the last decade. However, research on their applicability and reliability is still necessary. In this context, the aim of the present work was to compare three consumer-based methodologies and descriptive analysis for sensory characterization, considering as case study four sets of orange-flavoured powdered drinks, differing in the number of samples and the extent to which they represented the whole product category. A trained assessor panel evaluated sample sets using descriptive analysis, while groups of 100 consumers evaluated samples using one of three methodologies: CATA questions, projective mapping (PM) and polarized sensory positioning (PSP). Across the four sample sets, the three-consumer based methodologies provided similar information regarding the main similarities and differences among samples, which did not largely differ from that obtained using descriptive analysis. The main difference among the methodologies was related to the relative importance given to the sensory characteristics when evaluating differences among samples, which led to differences in the dimensionality of the sensory spaces. Sample configurations from PM and PSP required more dimensions than those from descriptive analysis and CATA questions to fully explain differences among samples. None of the consumer-based methodologies outperformed descriptive analysis in terms of ability to discriminate samples, being CATA questions the methodology that showed the lowest discrimination. Implications for the selection of consumer-based methodologies for specific applications are discussed.

Creator

Antúnez, Lucía.
Vidal, Leticia.
de Saldamando, Luis

Source

Food Quality and Preference v. 56, 2017. -- p. 149-163

Publisher

Elsevier

Date

2017

Rights

Información sobre Derechos de Autor

(Por favor lea este aviso antes de abrir los documentos u objetos)

La legislación uruguaya protege el derecho de autor sobre toda creación literaria, científica o artística, tanto en lo que tiene que ver con sus derechos morales, como en lo referente a los derechos patrimoniales con sujeción a lo establecido por el derecho común y las siguientes leyes (LEY 9.739 DE 17 DE DICIEMBRE DE 1937 SOBRE PROPIEDAD LITERARIA Y ARTISTICA CON LAS MODIFICACIONES INTRODUCIDAS POR LA LEY DE DERECHO DE AUTOR Y DERECHOS CONEXOS No. 17.616 DE 10 DE ENERO DE 2003, LEY 17.805 DE 26 DE AGOSTO DE 2004, LEY 18.046 DE 24 DE OCTUBRE DE 2006)

ADVERTENCIA - La consulta de este documento queda condicionada a la aceptación de las siguientes condiciones de uso: Este documento es únicamente para usos privados enmarcados en actividades de investigación y docencia. No se autoriza su reproducción con fines de lucro. Esta reserva de derechos afecta tanto los datos del documento como a sus contenidos. En la utilización o cita de partes debe indicarse el nombre de la persona autora.

Format

Papel

Language

Español

Type

Tesis

Identifier

DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.09.013

Document Item Type Metadata

Original Format

Papel
Date Added
May 31, 2017
Collection
Bibliografía Nacional Química
Item Type
Document
Tags
, , ,
Citation
Antúnez, Lucía. et al., “Comparison of consumer-based methodologies for sensory characterization : Case study with four sample sets of powdered drinks,” RIQUIM - Repositorio Institucional de la Facultad de Química - UdelaR, accessed November 17, 2025, https://riquim.fq.edu.uy/items/show/4605.